Maintenance · Assets · Suppliers

Keep every asset, every task and every service provider under control.

Manutex brings tickets, assets, preventive plans, costs and suppliers into one system — and adds an agent that reads what your operation already produces (a WhatsApp thread, an inspection spreadsheet, a PDF report) and returns ticket drafts for a human to approve.

No Manutex suggestion becomes a ticket until someone clicks.

A cook opens a ticket from his phone in front of a freezer caked with ice, attaching a photo and a voice note to the record.
The ticket starts where the problem is, with photo, voice and asset already attached.

Illustrative images · screens shown with sample data

Built against a real operation, not against a prototype.

Manutex was designed from actual building condition surveys: equipment with a history of repeat failures, a ticket that starts life in a WhatsApp thread, preventive work nobody remembers to open. Every module went live solving a problem that already existed — not filling a demo screen.

8
modules live in production
1475
automated tests
138
end-to-end scenarios
4
roles, with tenant isolation in the database
A maintenance professional works through the extraction hood preventive checklist on a tablet inside a commercial kitchen.
Preventive work is triggered by the plan and its frequency — not by the memory of the busiest person in the building.

These numbers describe the system, not the outcome of your contract. We do not publish response time, avoided cost or uptime: those would be estimates, and an estimate on a sales page is a guess in good typography. When a closed cycle can support such numbers, they will be published with the methodology attached.

The usual

Maintenance lives in WhatsApp, in a spreadsheet, and in one person's head.

Nobody complains while it works. The bill arrives when that person leaves, the equipment stops, or the insurer asks for proof.

A desk buried in invoices, paperwork, sticky notes and WhatsApp messages about maintenance problems.
Before: the request lives in the group chat, on a sticky note and in the memory of whoever was there.
01

History that disappears

The technician fixed it, sent a voice note to the group and left. Six months later nobody knows what was replaced, by whom, or what it cost.

02

Preventive work always late

The plan exists on paper. The work order only appears when someone remembers — and that someone is the busiest person on site.

03

Spending with no trail

The invoice was paid, the budget was not. Nobody can say what a machine cost to keep this year, so nobody decides when to replace it.

04

The same failure, again

With no per-asset history, a recurring fault looks new — and gets diagnosed from scratch every time, paying for the call-out every time.

How the system works

From a loose signal to proof it was solved.

Six steps. Each one leaves a record, and none of them depends on someone remembering.

A housekeeper photographs a leaking air conditioner in a hotel room; beside her, the ticket draft built from the photo and the voice note waits for approval.
Capture, understand, organise and approve: the report becomes a structured draft, and a person confirms it before it becomes a ticket.
  1. 01

    Capture

    A ticket opened on a phone with a photo, dictated by voice, or extracted from a document the operation already had.

  2. 02

    Understand

    Area, asset, category, technical discipline and priority — proposed by the system, confirmed by a person.

  3. 03

    Organise

    It becomes a corrective ticket, a preventive plan, an asset occurrence or an alert, whichever fits.

  4. 04

    Act

    Owner, deadline, priority, supplier and responsibility matrix set on the ticket itself.

  5. 05

    Verify

    Resolving requires attached evidence. There is no closing a ticket by typing “done”.

  6. 06

    Learn

    Per-asset history, cost by category, recurrence and preventive compliance become dashboard indicators.

A technician services refrigeration equipment; beside the work, the record shows the attached photo, the supplier in charge and the service closed with date and time.
Closing a ticket requires attached evidence: what was done, by whom, when and at what cost.
A crop of the Manutex management dashboard, with cost by category and assets per site.
Only at the end does it become a metric: recurrence, cost by category and preventive compliance come out of recorded work, not out of typing.

Modules

Everything the operation needs, in one place.

Live

Every module below is live today, in production — none of it is a roadmap promise.

Tickets with evidence

Seven states, priority, deadline, emergency flag with written justification, comments, responsibility matrix and full history. Resolving requires an attachment.

Assets with memory

Technical profile, versioned documents, occurrences, alerts with per-person read receipts, costs and asset-tag control.

Automatic preventive work

Eight frequencies. Orders are generated inside the database on a schedule — a forgotten plan produces one order, not thirty.

Cleaning

Same engine as preventive work, its own view, with checklist and materials. One order counts in both modules without being executed twice.

Costs

Entries by category, budget versus actual, monthly trend, anomaly flags and attached invoices.

Management dashboard

Five maintenance indicators with editable targets and twelve clickable charts — every number opens the already-filtered list.

Team and access

Four roles, page-level access per person, per-site scoping and bulk user import from a spreadsheet.

Audit trail

Append-only record of who changed what and when. Nothing is deleted; records are deactivated, never removed.

What makes it different

An agent that reads what your operation already produces.

Most maintenance software starts when somebody types a ticket. Manutex starts earlier: in the file that already exists.

Drop the mess, get drafts back

WhatsApp group exports (the whole .zip included), inspection spreadsheets, Word documents and PDF reports. The agent separates what is a maintenance problem, proposes title, area, asset, priority and deadline, and keeps the literal excerpt it took each one from.

Speak instead of typing

Record the audio, the system transcribes it and pre-fills the ticket form. Whoever is standing in front of the leak should not have to stop and write.

The policy becomes preventive work

The insurance PDF is read and the OBLIGATIONS it places on you become preventive suggestions — each with the literal clause shown next to it.

Ask the archive

The agent queries assets, tickets, occurrences, preventive plans, suppliers and the text of indexed manuals. It answers citing its source, separates recorded fact from hypothesis, and writes nothing: at most it prepares a draft for you to confirm.

Every Manutex proposal goes through human approval before it becomes a record. AI spend has a monthly ceiling per customer and every call is logged with its cost.

Why trust it

The control is in the architecture, not in the promise.

Isolation proven at runtime

Each organisation only sees its own data, enforced by database policy — and that is verified by an automated test against the real project, not by code review.

Human approval is mandatory

No AI route writes to the database. What it produces is a draft; turning it into a record takes a click from someone with permission.

Proof of execution

Resolving a ticket requires attached evidence, and every registry change lands in a trail that cannot be edited or deleted.

AI spend ceiling

A monthly limit in dollars per organisation, checked before every call. Consumption is visible per customer, with the provider's real cost — never an estimate.

Ready to get maintenance out of WhatsApp?

A 30-minute conversation and a demo using your operation's real data, not sample data.

Create your account, upload your spreadsheets and WhatsApp group — the system arrives already set up. No credit card.